- Eclipsemc: Bitcoin Mining Pool - Eclipse ...

*Bitcoinium v1.5.0* [Android] Support for Bitcoin Central, Bitfloor and Bitcoin24 exchanges. EclipseMC, Slush, and 50BTC mining pools. Customizable price alarm sound and silent/vibrate mode override. Option for bid/ask on widget and refresh only on WiFi

*Bitcoinium v1.5.0* [Android] Support for Bitcoin Central, Bitfloor and Bitcoin24 exchanges. EclipseMC, Slush, and 50BTC mining pools. Customizable price alarm sound and silent/vibrate mode override. Option for bid/ask on widget and refresh only on WiFi submitted by veken0m to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

BIP65 Deployment Status at ~26%, Remind your Mining Pool to Upgrade

Pools with "YES" are now producing v4 blocks while pools with "NO" are not, pools with "PARTIAL" have produced v3 blocks after v4 blocks indicating they have only upgraded some of their nodes. Services that run a full node for transaction processing and users also need to upgrade otherwise they should wait for at least 6 confirmations.
Note: Any users running Bitcoin Core should upgrade to 0.11.2 the network, the network needs a lot more nodes running BIP65 compatible code. We should try and get a few thousand nodes upgraded before BIP65 takes effect.
Warning: Because XT has not yet merged BIP65 support, it may extend an invalid chain once 75% is reached, although it is unlikely an invalid chain will be produced at that point because CLTV is non-standard
AntPool NO
F2Pool YES
Slush YES
KnCMiner NO
21 Inc. NO
Telco 214 YES
Eligius NO
BitClub Network YES
BitMinter NO
Bitcoin Affiliate Network YES
Solo CKPool YES
Kano CKPool YES
EclipseMC NO
submitted by Lightsword to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Is it worth it to buy a 60 GH/s miner at this stage of the game?

So I've arrived at the bitcoin party a bit too late, but I managed to get my hands on a Jalapeno miner that runs at 7.8 GH/s for next to nothing and got it up and running with EclipseMC yesterday. In the last 24 hours it has produced 0.0027807 BTC, but it hasn't found any new blocks. I also found someone willing to sell a 60 GH/s for $450, but I don't know if it will be profitable so late in the Bitcoin game. I suppose I could always mine NameCoins as well and hope that their value increases over the next couple of years, but I'm not sure if it's worth it.
I've read all sorts of differing opinions after some significant googling, but I thought I'd ask the community here to see what everyone thinks. I also don't pay utilities, so power isn't a factor for me. :)
submitted by vitasmortis to BitcoinMining [link] [comments]

Here's some good tools to know about in case you ever have a nonconfirming, stuck transaction you want to try to re-spend! (happened to me recently)

A general method for getting a transaction unstuck, or how pulling off a double-spend doesn't necessarily make you an asshole.
Hi /bitcoin,
Yesterday I had a bit of an ordeal with a few hundred bucks worth of coins stuck in limbo, due to a transaction (which wasn't even my transaction) that would not confirm.
Hopefully this write-up can help people who might find themselves in the same boat down the line.
BACKSTORY: I zapped some coins to a wallet so that I could do a SharedCoin transaction. Set it up, it seemed to execute fine, smooth sailing. The only problem was, this SharedCoin transaction was taking forever to confirm.
I got impatient and decided to investigate. I used the explorer to look at the other inputs into the SharedCoin transaction. Some of the inputs were unconfirmed, which was the culprit. Tracing back these unconfirmed inputs to their ultimate source (many steps back), I found one transaction that was the root cause of it all (it had one output that was less than 0.01, a size of >2kb, and zero transaction fee). In other words, it was unlikely that this transaction would ever be confirmed. This shittily crafted transaction was holding up the confirmation of every transaction that subsequently depended on it! Grr.
As an aside, I was actually quite surprised that allows inputs into SharedCoin transactions which depend on such shitty transactions which will probably never confirm. Hopefully they fix this, because it can really screw over the other participants in a SharedCoin transaction, even though they are not at fault.
TAKING ACTION: I waited for several hours hoping for a mining miracle: that some pool would just confirm this one shitty transaction holding the whole queue up. I read a comment by luke-jr somewhere saying that certain pools (Eligius and EclipseMC, IIRC) actually try to confirm bad zero-fee transactions as long as subsequent transactions depending on them do have correct feeing. That was heartening, but even though those pools mined some blocks during my wait, it didn't fix my problem.
Finally I decided to try to execute a double spend in order to get my coins unstuck. (Maybe double-spend is the wrong word... re-spend? Both the original and the re-spend were transactions to myself -- I wasn't out to defraud anyone, just get my coins unstuck). The decision was partly out of impatience, partly just to see if it was possible. I though it might be, given that estimated that the SharedCoin transaction only had like 20-something-% propagation into the network. So, at least that was probably working in my favor. I believe typically, having a well-connected node, might get better propagation, so YMMV.
Here's what I did:
CONCLUSION: Although I fell asleep before I could see whether or not it worked, next morning I saw that the re-spend transaction had gone through. It was confirmed only about 8 hours after the original transaction was broadcast (which conflicts with some forum posts I read claiming that you should wait 24-48 hrs before attempting a re-spend on stuck coins). The block containing my re-spend had been mined by Eligius, which may suggest that their pushtx site was the one that ended up working for me.
Executing a successful double-spend on a transaction of yours that will not confirm seems to be the best and fastest method, currently, for getting your coins unstuck.
Most wallet softwares won't let you construct a double-spend txn if they already know about the first transaction, though!
So, we gotta take matters into our own hands. Here's what to do: can help you make raw transactions as long as you have the private key.
With a raw tx in hand, you can copypaste and use all of the following pushtx tools to widely disperse a raw transaction into the network and hope a miner picks it up: pushtx pushtx
Eligius pool pushtx
Coinbin pushtx
It's important to disseminate the re-spending raw txn as widely as possible, because nodes that saw the original txn generally do not rebroadcast what they perceive as a double spend attempt. Use all four pushtx websites (if there's more that I missed, please let me know and I'll update the list). Sometimes it will get rejected by some or all pushtx sites; if so, waiting longer will probably help (eventually nodes will forget the original transaction assuming it never confirms).
Hopefully that wasn't too boring of a story. Thanks for reading!
submitted by goonsack to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

2Gh-3Gh enough?

So, I have 6 USB ASIC Miners, they run on average anywhere from 2.1 to 3.1 Gh. I have been mining on EclipseMC for about 2 weeks and only have gotten 0.0105..... BTC. As of right now they appear to be generating next to nothing. Is that enough Gh? Is there a better pool to mine in? Should I just sell these right now and only take a small loss? When I bought them, I used a bitcoin calculator, and it seemed to think I would make my money back in 3.5 months.. but I dont think I can even do that now with the difficulty going up?
submitted by ShreddinPB to BitcoinMining [link] [comments]

Ubuntu Cloud and the future of Bitcoin

Just met Kyle Macdonald on a flight home and after discussing Ubuntu OS for mobile devices we got into a discussion about Bitcoin.
Needless to say Canonical has MANY systems active--and after a while he said he'd be interested in running some mining applications on EclipseMC to even out the current BTC Guild conundrum.
All in all he was a pretty cool guy and I can't wait to see what kind of effect this has on the overall Bitcoin environment. AMA as I'm on a plane at the moment and incredibly bored!!
submitted by bluetrevian to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Namecoin pool report: blocks 200378-201097

To answer the question "Why is namecoin hash rate only half of bitcoin?", I thought I'd share some statistics.
Major (>5%) pools over the last 720 blocks (95% confidence intervals):
Discus Fish: 44.00% +/- 3.58% 31.10% +/- 3.28% BTCGuild: 8.75% +/- 1.86% Eligius: 7.22% +/- 1.69% 
I am able to attribute all but one of the blocks over that 720 block sample period to other known pools.
Other observed pools:
From miners that don't mine Namecoin accounts for about 36% of Bitcoin's hash rate.
So, Namecoin's hash rate can be expected to be around 64% of Bitcoin's. I am not sure where backprop came up with that "half" figure, but I think this clearly explains most, if not all, of the difference.
submitted by rya_nc to Namecoin [link] [comments]

Help setting up mining

Hey guys, bitcoin mining noob here. I have been in bitcoins for around a month now having purchased some and so I understand how it all works quite well. I also started mining whenever I wasn't playing games on my PC (I get quite a low 140 mhash, but my PC is always turned on so I figure I might as well mine when I'm not gaming).
I've been mining on deepbit since i started using gui miner, but i often seem to get errors and have to stop/start mining to fix it. I've heard that this is more a problem with deepbit than anything else so wanted to switch to eclipsemc.
I've created my account, changed my worker name/pw and changed my gui miner settings but I'm seeing no evidence that it's working. The website doesnt show that i've mined anything. What did I do wrong? Can anyone help me out?
tldr: Not new to bitcoins, new to mining, moved from deepbit to eclipsemc, can't get it working.. halp.
submitted by jaynemesis to BitcoinMining [link] [comments]

Need help on setting up EasyMiner

I have an Eclipsemc account and a bitcoin wallet.
There is an option in EasyMiner to put in a Worker name and a bit coin wallet but only one can be selected at a time with the radio buttons.
I'm not sure which one of these I should using. Does my Eclispemc worker automatically put bitcoins into my wallet? Is a eclipsemc account even necessary? Which one should I be using?
submitted by a_magic_wizard to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Cannot connect to Bitcoin RPC

I'd really appreciate some help, I'm running amd64 debian squeeze and I've downloaded the bitcoin client, poclbm, and phoenix. I'm trying to pool mine at and I've used "./ -u -p --host= --port=8337 -d 0" which returns "Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC". I also tried "./ -u DEVICE=0" and that returns [16/06/2011 17:43:44] Phoenix r101 starting... [16/06/2011 17:43:44] Failed to connect, retrying..." Obviously I've added in my user and password.
Here are the two devices I can use:
[0] AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor [1] ATI RV730
And here is my lspci -v:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV730XT [Radeon >HD 4670] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Hightech Information System Ltd. Device 2009 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 28 Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Memory at fe9e0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] I/O ports at c000 [size=256] Expansion ROM at fe9c0000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: fglrx_pci
If anyone can shine some light on the subject or just guide me in the right direction that would be great, thanks.
submitted by hexabyte to BitcoinMining [link] [comments]

Bitcoin, historia del poder de minado y la distribución de pools minería (LEER ABAJO LA DESCRIPCIÓN) ON NOUS A SUIVI DANS LA RUE AVEC MA COPINE (des mecs ... When You Invest $4.99 in Bitcoin - YouTube YouTube Website Analysis (Review) has 708 daily visitors and has the potential to earn up to 85 USD per month by showing ads. See traffic statistics for more information.. Hosted on IP address in San Francisco, United States. You can find similar websites and websites using the same design template.. has an estimated worth of 3,060 USD. You are here. Home » APIs » Eclipse MC. Track API Eclipse Mining Consortium is a mining pool with server locations in the US and EU. It is run by Josh Zerlan. This pool pays out using a double geometric share reward system. It also offers simultaneous merged mining of BTC and NMC].. The service was first available on June 13, 2011.. The coinbase signature for this pool is: "EMC". Eclipse MC is a Bitcoin mining consortium that allows users to unite their processing power to mine Bitcoins at a greater rate than they would individually. The available calls can be retrieved through the API, but include queries to get the pools statistical information, user information, and block information. The API uses REST calls, and returns JSON. An account is required with service, an ... This review is part of our series of bitcoin mining pool reviews. We came across Eclipse Mining Consortium some time ago, but recently reactivated our account on them as we did a pencil mod to our antminers to get them back online. Going since 2012, they have mined nearly 6000 blocks in that time, although at time of writing this has dropped to about a dozen a month, with US and EU based ...

[index] [38727] [5679] [42109] [27573] [32495] [15186] [25913] [45524] [6887] [49494]

Bitcoin, historia del poder de minado y la distribución de pools minería (LEER ABAJO LA DESCRIPCIÓN)

I like video Games. On nous a suivi dans la rue avec ma copine Contact pro : Contact[email protected] S'abonner Twitter https://twitter.c... Neste Dia dos Pais, escolha um dos kits exclusivos com preços especiais. How to Install Blue Fury USB ASIC 2.2GH/s Bitcoin Miner on Windows 7 1) Insert device into USB slot (it won't find a driver for it) 2) Download driver from: ... Esto es: La historia del poder de minado en bitcoin y la distribución de los pools de minería. El Proof of Work es lo más eficiente que puede existir. La eficiencia de una minera, empujará a ...